The Positives: The Ozone Layer
Zachary Rohwer
While I see the modern Environmental movement as an incredibly fantastic thing, I do have a couple of complaints. My biggest one probably being the fact that on social media, virtually only negatives discussed. While negatives do outweigh the positives, it’s important to be aware of all the great steps humanity is taking. An example of such a positive would be the Ozone Layer.
Starting in about the 1970’s, the ozone layer began rapidly decreasing. This was mostly a result of Ozone-depleting substances (ODS), such as aerosol. The ozone was depleting at a staggering rate of four percent a year, and drastic measures needed to be taken immediately.
Antarctic Ozone Hole in 2001
This was the cause of the Montreal Protocol in 1989, which banned or heavily restricted the use of many of these ODS substances. The Montreal Protocol is currently considered one of the most successful global environmental agreements ever created. While it has taken a fair bit of time, as of 2019 the ozone is starting to recover. According to some sources, the hole is smaller than it has been since the early 1980s.
Antarctic Ozone Hole as of October 20th
Now does this mean the problem is over and we’ve fixed our problem? Of course not. We probably won’t be seeing the ozone 100% repaired for 50+ years. However, what’s really important is how we’ve begun redeeming our past mistakes for this piece of the environment. I believe it’s important to have hope that we as a species can indeed redeem our past failings, and my issue with environmental social media is it portrays our current situation as one without hope. The Earth is portrayed as a place that is hopeless, that nothing is going right and it’s all falling about irreparably. That’s why this story is so important; it gives an example of the true positives of environmentalism; we’re fixing what needs to be fixed.
What do you think about the Ozone scenario? What’s your opinion on positivity/negativity in environmentalism? How do you feel about the whole scenario in general?
https://www.wsj.com/articles/ozone-hole-above-antarctica-shrinks-to-smallest-size-on-record-11571847944
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/nov/05/ozone-layer-healing-after-aerosols-un-northern-hemisphere
https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/300644-the-2019-ozone-layer-hole-is-now-the-smallest-on-record
https://www.wsj.com/articles/ozone-hole-above-antarctica-shrinks-to-smallest-size-on-record-11571847944
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/nov/05/ozone-layer-healing-after-aerosols-un-northern-hemisphere
https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/300644-the-2019-ozone-layer-hole-is-now-the-smallest-on-record
Comments
Personally, I feel like giving people a little bit of good news would make them feel like they did enough and become lax. That’s one of the biggest reasons people always blow the negatives out of proportion: to encourage the population to truly believe they need to take action. Banning is definitely a clear line of what flies and what doesn’t that is working really well and I feel like using it more often may not be a terrible idea.
- Andrew Thomas