The Fish Tube Meme
Alice Cao.
A portion of Twitter
users lost their collective minds last month after a video of a fish being
launched through a ridiculously long tube originally from 2014 went viral again
(https://twitter.com/cheddar/status/1159076692691955712). Built by Whooshh Innovations and dubbed the
“salmon cannon”, the transport system that was built to help salmon travel over
dams was given a far more popular name: “the fish tube”. Social media is often
seen as something that poisons the minds of the younger generations and the
source of infinite trouble for, and embarrassment from, the elder generations
when they manage to access the site and then see your edgy 21st century jokes
and pictures, but there is an upside that none can dispute. Social media can
spread news quickly (not always accurately at first) and reach a far greater
audience at a far greater rate than conventional newspapers can nowadays. This
brings us to the main topic: the potential social media has to spread awareness
about the environment and the problems it faces today.
For some context, here’s
how the tube works. There is a difference in pressure that propels the fish
forward; a positive pressure behind the fish and a negative pressure in front
of the fish that gives it a forward motion. Because the tube is made of soft,
flexible material, it fits around the shape of the fish and does not require a
constant column of water (like a waterslide would for humans) to propel its
scaly passengers. Tests have verified that fish are not harmed whatsoever
during their quick 18 mph trip through the cannon.
The reason scientists
needed to design these tubes (the first one was built in 2011) is because dams
cut off bodies of water from each other, not only barricading salmon from their
breeding grounds, but preventing the aquatic wildlife from naturally
interacting as they would for the ecosystem to remain stable. In addition, the
disruption of the river’s natural path (from running water to a lake of still
water) confuses migrating salmon and puts the entire next generation in danger
should the parents be unable to find suitable spawning grounds. So this human
intervention became necessary because of previous human intervention.
Previous attempts such as fish ladders and catching and hauling fish proved to
be ineffective. Fish ladders only allowed three percent of one species to go on
their traditional migration route, as found in a 2013 study. And then the more
straightforward method of capturing fish, loading them onto trucks, and
physically making the journey for them is not only distressing and dangerous
for the fish, but also leaves them dazed, disoriented, and unable to swim away
from predators in some cases. So the fish tube is yet another alternative
people are trying to use to help nature’s workings return to normal.
Raising awareness for
these very real, very important problems is key to eventually fixing them. The
public’s support and aid generally becomes the determining factor in many
projects because of donations that boost funds for organizations and the fact
that all four of the articles used in this blog post were found using the three
word search phrase “fish tube meme” is telling of just how much attention the
salmon cannon attracted in such a short amount of time. This brief flash of
fame that the fish tube had demonstrates the potential that social media could
have for helping save the planet. What do you think would be the benefits and
consequences of using social media to try and bring more awareness to the
world’s problems are (i.e. Greta Thunberg)?
Comments
-Andrew Thomas